Skip to main content

Google Expropriates Shakespeare


Why, Shakespeare could have come from any nationality, you see. It's only appropriate we depict him with a golden tan. If you think about it, he merely happened to be an Englishman. We can't treat accidents as essentials. What matters is Shakespeare's "universal spirit."

In fact, since Shakespeare belongs to the world, it's actually racist to try to nationally appropriate him. He's as much the property of China or Zimbabwe as he is of Britain. More so, given the historic wrongs of the white race, which can only be compensated for by a re-appropriation of the stolen literary and artistic gifts of the developing world, which were unfairly distributed in the first place. To deny them their Shakespeare is the sort of cultural colonization we're fighting, and that every supporter of equality should loudly condemn.

Q: What about Gabriel Garcia Marquez?

A: An immortal representative of the Columbian genius, of course.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Creating the Infra-human

The hunger for destruction bred by intentional deprivation doesn't merely attach to property, but to all facets of the "good life" that the White Christian Tradition brings. Rather than breeding indifference to the elements of Tradition, such as close knit family life, progressivism engenders hostility toward them. It cannot be lost on its cynical merchants that progressivism is merely the means by which psychosis becomes a normal condition of human existence, transforming its subjects into social weapons. The purpose of progressivism is not, as we have been told, to deliver spoils to the disenfranchised; it is to create rabidity in men that can be loosed on the enemies of their masters, who do not believe the leftist campfire stories by which the corp is initiated in hatred and blood. When the infra-human has been blooded, he is then fit only for a single purpose. In being deprived of what is truly human, the progressives learns a withering hatred of what is human, while
1 comment
Read more

The Late, Great Wage Economy

Robotics and AI are eliminating lower wage jobs , and will continue to do so. No economist of any standing disputes this claim any longer. Instead, the rear guard of the status quo has changed its tactic from denial outright to that of the lullaby. Sure, the precipitous drop in the cost of automation is affecting employment, but it’s all going to be ok. Trust us. We’re the experts. Thus goes the tune. Bedside, liberal academics offer charming fairy tales such as “re-skilling” and “up-skilling” -all based on a presumption of IQ equality, or at least its mutability. But the former doesn’t exist and the latter is highly limited. By contrast, professional pols on the left are afflicted by a malady one might call Panglossism. More specifically, that there is nothing whatever wrong with the U.S. economy apart from the bugaboos of income inequality and intractable privilege, which we might expect to be remedied in the next pogrom against microaggressors. Thus academia is beginning to admit wh
1 comment
Read more

[Insert Modifier Here] Justice

Any word placed in front of the term "justice" as a modifier indicates the perversion of the latter. Special forms of justice seem to always take the form of a material discount. It is not a great mystery, then, that Cultural Marxism in all its forms and disguises has economics at its center. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/20/harvard-law-activists-demand-free-tuition-as-a-mat/
Post a Comment
Read more